• Differences Between PEO and EOR

    An EOR is much more expensive because they take on all of the liability and compliance on behalf of the company. Company’s use an EOR to hire employees globally where they do not have a local legal entity.

    A PEO is a co-employment model and helps the company set up the compliance, tax, payroll, benefits, and HR processes, but tend to operate more as a consultancy. Company’s use a PEO to outsource HR functions where they have their own local legal entity. Most company’s find it too expensive to have a PEO after 100 employees.

    See also:


  • The Challenge With Compliance Products Is Selling Non-Compliance

    When selling a compliance product, you often need to sell non-compliance; what happens to the customer if they are not compliant. The challenge with that is there are alternatives, for example selectively ignoring the obligation or doing the bare minimum to avoid the worst of it. This can also present challenges with who the buyer is. If a legal and compliance person is the champion, they can get stuck convincing the decision maker (e.g. CEO) and it can take a long time adding uncertainty to the sales process.

    See also:


  • It Takes Two Months to Hire in a New Country

    When trying to hire someone in a new country, it can take on average two months to put in place all off the infrastructure for employment. This includes research (local laws, regulations, taxes) setting up local payroll (often through a consulting firm familiar with the location) and even setting up a subsidiary company which requires it’s own research into taxes and maintenance.

    The most difficult part is determining if it is worth it to set up a legal entity (subsidiary). Key factors include, payroll, sales tax, legal cost of managing entity, and employment risk due to employment law. To decide, it typically involves researching, speaking with an international law firm, getting a second opinion from an employment law firm, talk to a tax consulting firm, and speaking with accounting.

    However, once it is set up properly once you can mostly hire as many people you need.

    See also:


  • Chicken Sexer

    A chicken sexer is a job where, shortly after hatching, someone determines the sex of the chicken. There is no explicit knowledge on how to do that, accuracy is built up through calibrating an intuition in an apprenticeship model (you can only learn to be a chicken sexer by working repeatedly with a chicken sexer).

    See also:


  • What Color Is Your Function

    Functions that must be called or handled in a particular way can be thought of as having different colors. The programmer needs to understand the color of functions and this adds complexity (and bugs).

    This is particularly bad with callback based control flow (either functions return values or nothing). Promises improves things and async / await is significantly better, but you still can’t call an asynchronous function in a synchronous one, forcing you to structure your program around it.

    Read the essay


  • No One Identifies as Conventional Minded

    Considering there actually are conventional-minded people and independent-minded people in the world, no one considers themselves as conventional-minded. It’s more favorable to think of oneself as independent-minded, perhaps due to the way we value individualism. In Paul Graham’s essay How to think for yourself, he provides an example of this with conspiracy theorists. On their surface they reject some commonly held belief, but the strength of their conviction reveals their conventional-mindedness just within subset of society (not to mention how conspiracy theories tend to be planted by others for political gain).

    See also:


  • The Most Effective People Care a Lot

    Those who care a great deal are the most effective people in any pursuit. It’s difficult to imagine the opposite being true, someone who doesn’t really care about what they are doing being the most effective at their job. Caring is a low-level characteristic that is difficult (or impossible) to fake and does not have any preconditions (caring seems to be a behavioral default not everyone has). It has a large impact on the quality of work and depth of contribution (effectiveness).

    See also:


  • Complacency Comes From Mistakenly Believing Success Is Assured

    Companies on a clear upward trajectory can still fail not from external threats, but from complacency of the people running and operating the company. This happens when they mistakenly believe success is assured, but empirically this is not true (plenty of examples of industry darlings getting big and going under).

    Complacency is made worse when new people join merely to have a seat on a rocket ship. They exhibit less of the qualities of what built the rocket ship in the first place and causes those that did to also be lulled into complacency (argumentum ad populum).

    See also:


  • Four Kinds of Luck

    There are four kinds of luck.

    The simplest form is extrinsic, something fortunate happens to youβ€”we tend to call that blind luck.

    Then there is luck that happens by increasing the number of chances to be luckyβ€”we often see that in people who output an enormous amount and are in constant motion.

    The next is luck from being skilled in a particular area and spotting lucky breaks that others don’t noticeβ€”this is prepared luck.

    Lastly, there is luck that is drawn to you from being in a position where other’s luck becomes your luckβ€”this is due to your unique characteristics, second-order luck. This is the hardest to understand, but consider the example of a deep sea diver who is the best in the world. When a sunken ship filled with treasure is discovered deep underwater, this opportunity will go to them because they are known to be the best.

    See also:


  • Habit Stacking

    Using an established habit as a cue for initiating another habit. For example, using the fact that you brush your teeth every night and build on it by flossing too. This makes it more likely that you will perform the action and establish a habit.

    It also works both waysβ€”not having a consistent cue to stack on top of means you will be less likely to remember to do the second habit.

    See also: